Skip to Main Content

Are property owners and insurers ready for the next big earthquake?

In 1994, the magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquake hit California, damaging 40,000 buildings and causing insured losses of $12.5 billion.1 If an earthquake like Northridge were to occur today, it could cost nearly $19 billion in insured losses.2 By 2044, there is a 93% possibility that an earthquake of that magnitude or greater will strike California.3 According to our models, the total replacement value of all affected properties is estimated to be about $5 trillion.4

But earthquakes aren’t just limited to the West Coast.5,6 Over 20,000 earthquakes happen every year.7,8 Every day the Earth’s tectonic plates are in constant motion beneath our feet, and there are even areas like the New Madrid Seismic Zone in the Midwest that are at risk despite not being located anywhere near a plate boundary.9

Many insurers use earthquake models to prepare them for potential catastrophes and help them make informed decisions about what risks to take on.

California experiences 90% of America’s earthquakes, yet only 13% of its residents have earthquake insurance.

So the big question facing many insurers and policyholders is: Are we equipped for these rare-but-devastating disasters?

New developments in earthquake modeling

Many insurers use earthquake models to prepare them for potential catastrophes and help them make informed decisions about what risks to take on.

The models, which estimate how big future earthquakes will likely be and how often they may occur, look at past loss experience, construction types, soil profiles, liquefaction, nearby landslides, and potential perils like sprinkler leakage and fire following an event. The models also look at the precise locations of homes that are being insured and what mitigation measures they have installed. For example, are masonry chimneys secured? Are columns appropriately braced or horizontally supported?

The most advanced earthquake models pull data from recent events along with historical events to understand seismic activity and estimate how soon the next quake might hit. After an earthquake, post-event damage surveys are conducted to collect data to help further enhance the models in the future.

These models help insurers make decisions on what kind of exposures they’ll want to take on, and how much they might cost if a quake hit. That can help insurers decide if they want to reduce or increase their risk, or if they want to place more money in reserve to pay out claims should an earthquake occur.

There are two major types of earthquake models:

  • A time independent model. With this kind of model, the recurrence rate, or how often earthquakes occur, is assumed to be constant over time. That means researchers consider the earthquake risk in an area to be constant over time, regardless of when the last rupture actually occurred. This kind of model doesn’t account for the impact of recent events, like fracking or whether an earthquake recently occurred on the fault in question (or is long overdue).
  • A time dependent model. With this model, in addition to historical earthquake data, researchers consider the buildup of strain on faults over time and allow the relative risk to vary based on the current environmental changes, including the time since the last damage-causing rupture.10

The scarcity of historical information on when earthquakes occurred is often a challenge with respect to these models,11 but seismologists have been accumulating more and more data about earthquakes with every year. For example, if the last big earthquake in an earthquake-prone area was 300 years ago, and there was another big earthquake 22 years ago, seismologists might tell you that there is likely a low-probability of another earthquake in the near future, because seismic energy has been released, and the earthquake fault is typically relatively relaxed after such an event.12

But if earthquakes typically occur on a fault every 300 years, and there hasn’t been one for 350 years, then it’s safe to assume there likely is a lot of pressure building up, and people in that area should be careful—and strongly consider buying earthquake insurance.

Many policyholders are underbuying earthquake coverage

More than 143 million Americans living in 48 states are exposed to potentially damaging ground shaking from earthquakes, but many in the United States have not bought earthquake insurance.13 California experiences 90% of America’s earthquakes, yet only 13% of its residents have earthquake insurance.14

In Washington, America’s second-most earthquake prone state, only 11.3% of residents were covered in 2017.15 A recent poll found that the amount of American homeowners with earthquake insurance may be only 11%.16

People who underestimate the risk of not buying earthquake insurance include:

More than 143 million Americans living in 48 states are exposed to potentially damaging ground shaking from earthquakes.

  • People living in areas where there hasn’t been a recent earthquake, despite those areas’ long history of earthquakes. This includes areas of California and the Pacific Northwest, but also areas in the Midwest and parts of South Carolina, as well.17
  • Building owners or local governments in charge of buildings that are aging and are now more vulnerable to the effects of an earthquake. 

  • People who are only living in an earthquake-prone area for a short amount of time. Some homeowners may reason that they are only living in the area for a few years, and surely an earthquake won’t occur. Some may also assume earthquakes are covered under a homeowners policy; however, earthquake is excluded under the base ISO Homeowners and Dwelling policy forms.

  • Renters, who don’t own the buildings they’re living in. But what many homeowners and renters may not fully realize is that while earthquakes are rare in some areas, when they do occur, their impact can be devastating. 

Insurers may want to urge their policyholders to pack an earthquake bag, filled with three days’ worth of water supply and food, as well as first aid kits, flashlights, copies of personal documents and other necessities, and invest in earthquake coverage before the quake hits. They may want to tell their policyholders to examine their existing earthquake policies for limits, and consider purchasing additional insurance if needed.

The next earthquake is likely to hit soon. Recently, an earthquake of 7.3 magnitude occurred off the coast of Japan, causing an electric blackout in over 2 million homes in Tokyo on March 16. For many insurers and policyholders alike, being prepared will be crucial. For more information on how to prepare for the next big quake, Verisk offers earthquake models that offer a comprehensive view of seismic hazard, using information from GPS networks, past loss costs and historical data on past ruptures.

Earthquake coverage is available on an optional basis for both the ISO Homeowners and Dwelling Property programs.

See how our earthquake models assess and manage seismic risk, helping prepare policyholders for the potentially catastrophic effects of an earthquake.

Serge Gagarin

Serge Gagarin is a Manager of Segment Marketing at AIR Worldwide. You can contact him at

You might also like

Visualize Subscribe

Get the best of Visualize!

Get the latest news and insights straight to your inbox.

Subscribe now

  1. Top 10 historical earthquakes in the U.S.: What would they cost today?, Verisk,  November 6, 2017,  < >, accessed on April 5, 2022.
  2. Touchstone Re, Verisk,  < >, accessed on March 24, 2022.
  3. UCERF3: A New Earthquake Forecast for California’s Complex Fault System, USGS,  < >, accessed on March 17, 2022.
  4. Who Will Pay for the Next Great California Earthquake?, Verisk, November 1, 2018, < >, accessed on March 18, 2022.
  5. John Egan, Amy Danise, “California Edges Closer To The Big One,” Forbes, October 8, 2020, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  6. NBC Bay Area Staff, “Scientists Say Big Earthquake Hitting Bay Area Is Inevitable,” NBC, March 3, 2022, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  7. National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC),, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  8. USGS Magnitude 2.5+ Earthquakes, Past Day,, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022. 
  9. Tectonic Plate, ScienceDirect, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  10. Time-Dependent vs. Time-Independent Views of Seismicity, Verisk, < >, accessed on March 31, 2022.
  11. Historical and Geological Studies of Earthquakes, Springer Open Scientific Journal,  <  >, accessed on April 5, 2022. 
  12. Time-independent and Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast Model 1.0, Seismological Research Letters,  <  >, accessed on April 5, 2022
  13. Nearly Half of All Americans Exposed to Potentially Damaging Earthquakes,,  < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  14. “Why Only 13% Of California Homeowners Have Earthquake Insurance,” NPR, July 9, 2019, < >, accessed on March 14, 2022. 
  15. Earthquake Insurance,,  < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  16. Earthquake Insurance, Center for Insurance Policy and Research, October 14, 2021,  < >, accessed on March 11, 2022. 
  17. Oklahoma has had a surge of earthquakes since 2009. Are they due to fracking?,, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  18. How to Make an Earthquake Emergency Kit, California Earthquake Authority, October 30, 2019, < >, accessed on March 11, 2022.
  19. Deadly earthquake in Japan knocks out power to millions, prompts brief tsunami advisory, CBS News, March 16,  2022,  <  >, accessed on March 18, 2022. 

You will soon be redirected to the 3E website. If the page has not redirected, please visit the 3E site here. Please visit our newsroom to learn more about this agreement: Verisk Announces Sale of 3E Business to New Mountain Capital.